Dr Wei Li and Dr Duane Miller conduct collaborative research at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, USA, with a focus on the development of new compounds for cancer treatment. Their new series of novel tubulin inhibitors disrupt microtubule formation within cells, therefore preventing tumour growth.
Dr Li and Dr Miller’s new series of novel tubulin inhibitors disrupt microtubule formation within cells, and therefore preventing tumour growth
The components of microtubules are two building blocks known as α- and β-tubulin. Together they assemble into long filaments of pairs of these two protein subunits. The target site for the compounds being developed by Dr Li and Dr Miller is a region on these tubulin subunits. Unlike other established cancer therapies, their compounds are designed to bind to the colchicine binding site. The site is named after the first compound discovered to bind to tubulin, which is derived from the autumn crocus. Although the site was discovered many decades ago, this approach remains very challenging in cancer drug development.
Lack of effective therapeutics sparks novel drug development
Researchers have traditionally favoured other sites as targets – such as that for the widely used chemotherapeutic taxane class of drugs. These and many other anti-cancer drugs are aimed at disrupting microtubule structure and dynamics, either by stabilising or destabilising them. Although existing chemotherapeutic drugs with this mechanism of action have been successful in treating many cancers, and in recent years several new tubulin inhibitor drugs have been developed, treatment options remain inadequate. Their success is generally short term as drug resistance often develops and the drugs become highly toxic. This has led Dr Li and Dr Miller to shift their focus towards the colchicine binding site, one of the most important for the destabilisation of tubulin polymers into microtubules.
A new class of tubulin inhibitor
Collaborating with Dr Dalton, Dr Li and Dr Miller initially synthesised a series of microtubule destabilisers: substituted methoxybenzoyl-ary-thiazole (SMART) compounds. By binding to the colchicine binding site of tubulin, they inhibit the polymerisation of the subunits into microtubules. These compounds circumvent the drug resistance issues that have caused other microtubule-stabilising drugs to become ineffective. The first line of compounds the researchers analysed were promising with regards to efficacy, but lacked good water solubility. This means they would require delivery with a co-solvent to be used clinically. This is problematic, as this approach is associated with high levels of toxicity. Therefore, to overcome this obstacle and increase the bioavailable lifetime of the compound, Dr Li and Dr Miller pushed forward with research and development.
Unlike other established cancer therapies, Dr Li and Dr Miller’s compounds are designed to bind to the colchicine binding site. Although discovered many decades ago, this approach remains very challenging in cancer drug development
SMART drug delivery
Initially, in Dr Mahato’s lab at UNMC, they tried encapsulating the drug into nanoparticle formulations. This significantly reduced the toxicity while effectively targeting tumour tissue. Despite this, Dr Li, Dr Miller, and Dr Mahato deemed these initial nanoparticle formulations suboptimal, due to their relatively low drug-loading capacity and faster rate of drug release than desired. To improve on these factors and further mitigate toxic effects, they conjugated SMART-OH (a new SMART analogue) and a polymer to create P-SMART.
Polymer drug conjugates provide numerous advantages over the use of their parent drugs alone, including increased solubility, prolonged blood circulation time, enhanced bioavailability, decreased degradation and increased tumour accumulation. Indeed, both SMART-OH and P-SMART showed significant results for effectiveness against malignant melanoma cells, with P-SMART being the most effective with lowest toxicity.
To verify the effectiveness of their new compounds, Dr Mahato employed a mouse model of metastatic melanoma of the lung. Their experiments revealed that the compounds inhibited tumour growth and prolonged mouse survival, with efficacy against both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant melanoma tumours. Importantly, both compounds also inhibited cell invasion when tested in vitro, therefore demonstrating anti-metastatic properties. The P-SMART drug conjugate consequently provides a high potential to treat metastatic melanoma.
Future prospects
Dr Li and Dr Miller are set to achieve their goal of creating a new generation of small molecule tubulin inhibitors. They can be easily synthesised in the laboratory, and combined into an optimised nanoparticle formulation for drug delivery and future clinical trials. Excitingly, early research has also shown that the SMART and ABI compounds possess anticancer properties against breast, ovarian, colon and prostate cancer. Further trials, with a focus on utilising the compounds to treat these cancers, are on the horizon.
This project sprung from an earlier collaborative project between Dr Miller and Dr Dalton. Dr Li joined the project in 2004 and has been working with Dr Miller and Dr Dalton. Currently, Dr Li is responsible for most of the efforts in the project.
Why has drug development thus far been challenging for the colchicine binding site compared with others?
While colchicine itself is an approved drug for gout treatment, it is not FDA approved for cancer treatment due to its high toxicities. There have been a number of new compounds developed targeting the colchicine binding site. However, none of these agents targeting this binding site have obtained FDA approval. The main challenges are the toxicities associated with many of the existing compounds and that the structural requirement for colchicine binding is very exquisite.
How reliable are mouse models of malignant melanoma as a predictor of human tumour response?
Traditionally, human cell lines implanted in nude mice are used for malignant melanoma. They are good models for initial efficacy studies, but are limited by their lack of human melanoma tumour heterogeneity and potentially altered genetic profile. Recently, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are becoming widely used since their responses are more predictive of human tumours. We are beginning to work with Dr Meenhard Herlyn at the Wistar Institute to test our tubulin inhibitors and their combinations with targeted drugs in PDX models.
Do you think polymer-conjugated drugs are the future of drug delivery methods instead of the compounds in isolation?
We think so. Due to its mechanism of action, it will be challenging to develop a tubulin inhibitor without side effects. Therefore, any drug delivery method that allow specific targeting of tumour cells will be helpful in increasing the therapeutic index. Polymer-conjugation is one of the approaches for tumour-selective delivery. We are also working on attaching these compounds to antibodies to create antibody–drug conjugates (ADC) to minimise potential systemic toxicities.
What are your plans for testing your novel compounds on other cancers?
We have established collaborations with other cancer researchers to test our novel compounds in pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, and breast cancer. Preliminary data are very promising. In fact, the company who currently licenses these compounds, The Female Health Company (FHC) and Aspen Park Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (APP), are developing these compounds for metastatic prostate cancer. If we can develop a really good compound, it can potentially be used for a number of cancer types.
Dr Li and Dr Miller are collaborative partners whose research focuses on determining improved therapies for malignant melanoma and other types of cancer. Their current research looks at developing novel classes of tubulin inhibitors targeting the colchicine binding site, capable of overcoming current drug-resistance issues.
Funding
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Collaborators
Dr James T Dalton (University of Michigan, USA); Dr Ram I Mahato (University of Nebraska Medical Center, USA); Dr Jinliang Yang (Sichuan University, China); Dr Stephen White (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, USA)
Bio
Dr Wei Li obtained his PhD in Chemistry from Columbia University, and is currently a Professor at UTHSC. His research is focused on small molecule drug discovery. He has published over 120 papers, is an inventor of five issued US patents and several issued patents from other countries.
Dr Duane Miller obtained his PhD in Medicinal Chemistry at the University of Washington (1969). He joined The Ohio State University Faculty in 1969 and moved to the UTHSC as the Van Vleet Professor in 1992. He has 409 publications and 16 book chapters. He is currently Professor Emeritus.Contact
Wei Li, PhD
Professor and Faculty Director of Instrument Facility
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
881 Madison Avenue, room 561
Memphis, TN 38163
USA
E: wli@uthsc.edu
T: +1 901 448 7532
W: https://academic.uthsc.edu/faculty/facepage.php?netID=wli&personnel_id=117649
